Coolidge v. New Hampshire
United States Supreme Court
403 U.S. 443 (1971)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Pamela Mason was murdered. Police questioned Edward Coolidge (defendant). Coolidge was cooperative. While Coolidge was taking a lie-detector test, police arrived at his home, questioned his wife, and obtained evidence from her. Police presented the evidence to the state attorney general, who was in charge of the prosecution. Police applied to the attorney general for arrest and search warrants, including a warrant to search Coolidge’s Pontiac. The attorney general, in his capacity as a justice of the peace, granted the warrant. Police arrested Coolidge. Police told Coolidge’s wife to leave, placed the house under guard, and had the Coolidges’ cars towed to the station. Microscopic evidence gathered from the Pontiac was presented against Coolidge at trial, over his motions to suppress, and a jury convicted him. The state supreme court affirmed, and Coolidge petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, contending the warrantless search of the Pontiac was unconstitutional.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.