Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

467 U.S. 867 (1984)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

United States Supreme Court

467 U.S. 867 (1984)

Facts

A class action suit was filed against the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Bank) (defendant), alleging racial discrimination against its employees. The class was certified as all black people who are or were employed at the Bank and were discriminated against because of their race (plaintiffs). Phyllis Baxter and five other Bank employees (Baxter petitioners) were members of the class and received published notice of the certification; they did not choose to opt out of the class. The district court found that the Bank had engaged in a pattern and practice of discrimination over a four year period, but did not engage in sufficient general discrimination pervasive enough to warrant granting relief to the plaintiffs. The Bank appealed. A few days later, the Baxter petitioners filed a discrimination suit separate from the class action. The Bank filed a motion to dismiss this suit, and the motion was denied by the district court. The Bank then filed an interlocutory appeal in the Baxter petitioner case, which was consolidated with the Bank’s pending appeal in the original suit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Court of Appeals) reversed the district court on the merits of the original case, holding that there was not enough evidence to establish a pattern or practice racial discrimination. The Court of Appeals also reversed the district court’s denial of the Bank’s motion to dismiss in the Baxter case, holding that under res judicata, its decision on the merits in the original suit precluded the Baxter petitioners from maintaining their own suits individually. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership