Cooper v. Goldfarb

154 F.3d 1321 (1998)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Cooper v. Goldfarb

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

154 F.3d 1321 (1998)

Facts

Peter Cooper (plaintiff) and David Goldfarb (defendant) both filed patent applications for artificial vascular grafts constructed from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The viability of the invention was dependent on the length of the fibrils that connected the nodes. Goldfarb’s application was filed while Cooper’s was still pending, resulting in a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) interference hearing. Goldfarb gave testimony concerning his examination of fibral lengths, which was corroborated by testimony from two witnesses. The interference board determined that Cooper had conceived of the invention before Goldfarb but, due to Cooper’s failure to exercise diligence in reducing the invention to practice, Goldfarb was the first to successfully accomplish the necessary reduction to practice and thus the true inventor. Cooper appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In addition to contending that he deserved priority, Cooper also argued that Goldfarb’s reduction to practice should have been seen as inuring to Cooper’s benefit—that is, giving Cooper an advantage—an issue that the board had not considered.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership