Coopers & Lybrand v. Fox
Colorado Court of Appeals
758 P.2d 683 (1988)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In early November 1981, Garry J. Fox (defendant) requested accounting services from Coopers & Lybrand (Coopers) (plaintiff). Fox met with a Coopers’s representative and informed the representative that he was acting on behalf of G. Fox and Partners, Inc. (corporation). Fox also informed the representative that the corporation had not yet been formed. The representative accepted the work requested by Fox. By mid-December, Coopers finished the work and billed both Fox and the corporation, which Fox had incorporated on December 4. However, Coopers never received the payment. Coopers sued Fox for the $10,827 owed on the ground that Fox was the corporation’s promoter and therefore personally liable for the amount owed. Fox argued that the corporation was Coopers’s client and that Coopers agreed to solely seek payment from the corporation. The trial court found that Coopers did not provide evidence of any express or implied agreement between Coopers and Fox concerning Fox’s individual liability. Therefore, the trial court held that Fox was not individually liable for the amount owed. The matter was appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.