Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 17,300+ case briefs...

Coors Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
802 F. Supp. 965 (1992)


Coors Brewing Company (plaintiff) made Coors Light by producing a “high gravity” brew and then adding water. Coors made all of the high-gravity brew for Coors Light at its Colorado headquarters. Most Coors Light was made by adding Colorado water at the headquarters. However, approximately 65 to 85 percent of the Coors Light sold in the Northeast was made by transporting the high-gravity brew to Virginia, where Virginia water was added to make the final product. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (defendant) produced a beer called Natural Light. Anheuser made a commercial comparing Natural Light to Coors Light. The commercial informed the public that a concentrated form of Coors Light left Colorado in a railroad car and traveled to Virginia. The commercial then stated that “local water dilutes the Rockies concentrate before it’s sent to you.” Finally, the commercial invited viewers to choose Natural Light, which left Anheuser breweries “fresh and ready to drink.” Coors sued Anheuser, claiming that the commercial falsely implied that Coors Light was not as fresh as Natural Light due to the way it was made. Coors conducted a consumer survey in which it asked consumers a series of questions after viewing the commercial. The survey first asked what the consumers recalled about the commercial and what the main theme of the commercial was. A statistically insignificant percentage of consumers responded to this question by saying that the beers were made differently. But 32 percent responded that the message was that Coors Light was diluted/watered down. The survey also asked, “[b]ased on the commercial,” whether the consumers believed that Coors Light and Natural Light were made the same way or differently. 67 percent of consumers responded to this question by saying that they thought the beers were made differently. Coors Light moved for a preliminary injunction.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Mukasey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 457,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 457,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 17,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial