Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Cope v. Scott

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
45 F.3d 445 (D.C. Cir. 1995)


Facts

John Cope (plaintiff) was driving on the proper side of a two-way, two-lane scenic road maintained by the National Park Service (NPS) (defendant), when a vehicle driven by Roland Scott (defendant) slid on a rain-slick section of the road and hit Cope’s car. The road was designed for pleasure driving and was not to be used as a thoroughfare by commuters into and out of the city. Nevertheless, commuters regularly used the road for this purpose, and as a result, the road became worn and slick when wet. Cope filed suit in federal district court against Scott and the NPS, alleging that the NPS was negligent by failing to (1) appropriately and adequately maintain the road and (2) place and maintain appropriate and adequate warning signs along the road. An engineering study had concluded that the specific stretch of the road was a high-accident area and fell below acceptable skid-resistance levels. However, improvements to the road were not high on the NPS’s list of priorities. The NPS moved for summary judgment, arguing that its inaction was discretionary and exempt from suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The district court agreed and granted summary judgment in the NPS’s favor. Cope appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.