Copeland v. Beard
Alabama Supreme Court
217 Ala. 216, 115 So. 389 (1928)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Marvin Copeland (defendant) bought real property on the condition that he would assume certain of the seller’s debts. B.V. Beard (plaintiff) was the seller’s creditor. On the same day, before Beard assented to having Copeland as her debtor, Copeland resold the property upon the condition that the new purchaser would assume the same debts of the original seller. As a result of this second transaction, the original seller released Copeland from Copeland’s promise to assume the seller’s indebtedness to Beard. Beard brought suit against Copeland, seeking to recover the debts. The trial court ruled in favor of Beard. The court of appeals affirmed. Copeland petitioned for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bouldin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.