Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
526 N.W.2d 402 (1995)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Sam Ulland, a veterinarian who was treating a cat owned by Greg and Betty Copeland (plaintiffs), was planning to visit their home when he asked if he could be accompanied by a student interested in veterinary medicine, Patty Johnson (defendant). The Copelands consented. Unbeknownst to them or to Ulland, Johnson worked for KSTP, a television station owned by Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. (Hubbard) (defendant). KSTP was preparing an investigative report on local veterinarians, and Johnson was secretly videotaping Ulland’s activities. After Ulland and Johnson visited the Copelands, KSTP aired the report, which included video footage of the interior of the Copelands’ home. The Copelands sued Johnson and Hubbard in a Minnesota court for trespass. Defendants moved for summary judgment, which the court granted. The Copelands appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.