Copperweld Steel Co. v. Demag-Mannesmann-Boehler
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
578 F.2d 953 (1978)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Demag-Mannesmann-Boehler (Demag) (defendant), a German company, sold a casting machine to Copperweld Steel Company (Copperweld) (plaintiff), an American company. The standard-form sale agreement contained a forum-selection clause that required any disputes arising from the contract to be litigated in Germany unless Demag chose to bring the action in the United States. This clause was expressly applicable to any export contract negotiated by Demag. The machine was originally supposed to be built and exported from Germany, but before the sale agreement was finalized, Demag and Copperweld concluded that the machine would be manufactured in the United States. After the sale, the machine failed to meet Copperweld’s requirements. Copperweld sued Demag in a federal district court for breach of contract, negligent design and manufacture, and negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation. Demag, relying on the forum-selection clause, moved to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court denied Demag’s motion and declined to enforce the forum-selection clause because the manufacturing facility, relevant records, witnesses, and customers were all located in the United States and because Demag did business and maintained offices in the United States. Demag appealed, arguing that the forum-selection clause was enforceable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rosenn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.