Copple v. City of Lincoln
Nebraska Supreme Court
315 N.W.2d 628 (1982)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
The City of Lincoln (the city) (plaintiff) city council approved an ordinance that changed the zoning classification of a tract of land in southwest Lancaster County (the county) from local-business-district and single-family-dwelling-district zoning to planned-regional-commercial-district zoning. Newt Copple (plaintiff) owned a tract of land in the northeast section of the county and had a pending application to build a regional shopping center on his land. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201, anyone aggrieved by a decision of the city council could appeal the decision to the district court. Copple filed a petition of appeal in the district court under § 15-1201, alleging that the city council’s approved zoning change would lead to business competition with Copple’s proposed shopping center that would detrimentally affect Copple and his property. The district court held that Copple was not an aggrieved person under Nebraska law, that Copple did not have standing to sue, and that even if Copple had standing, he had failed to prove a special injury. The court found that Copple’s claims lacked merit and dismissed the appeal. Copple appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clinton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.