Logourl black

Corcoran v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court
27 N.E.2d 451 (Ill. 1940)


Facts

John Corcoran (plaintiff) filed a negligence suit against the City of Chicago (Chicago) (defendant) for personal injuries sustained due to the condition of certain streets in Chicago. The evidence presented at trial was “conflicting.” The trial court found in favor of Corcoran. Chicago filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied. Chicago then appealed and the appellate court reversed and remanded the case for a new trial on the grounds that the trial court verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Corcoran filed a motion seeking to have the remanding part of the appellate court’s order stricken. By doing so, Corcoran was challenging the appellate court’s authority to order a new trial. It was Corcoran’s wish that, if he won on appeal, the Supreme Court of Illinois could simply order that the initial verdict in his favor be reinstated, without going through a new trial. The appellate court granted Corcoran’s motion. Chicago appealed. Corcoran opposed the appeal, arguing that by setting aside the jury’s decision on the evidence and ordering a new trial, the appellate court was effectively taking away Corcoran’s right to a trial by jury guaranteed in the Illinois Constitution.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 86,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,053 briefs - keyed to 161 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now