Cordero-Trejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

40 F.3d 482 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cordero-Trejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
40 F.3d 482 (1994)

Facts

Juan Francisco Cordero-Trejo (Cordero) (defendant) entered the United States from Guatemala, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (plaintiff) initiated deportation proceedings before an immigration judge (IJ). In proceedings, Cordero testified that he began working with a religious organization dedicated to providing medical care, food, and clothing to needy Guatemalans. Cordero testified that members of the group were threatened by armed men when working in rural areas and that he started receiving threatening anonymous phone calls telling him to stop working with the group. Cordero testified that his brothers were attacked and seriously injured by armed men who stated these attacks were related to Cordero’s work with the religious group. Cordero testified that in November 1987, the military stopped him while on a mission in a rural area and accused him of inciting rebellion. Cordero testified that in 1989, he had to suspend his work with social workers because of anonymous threats related to his missionary work. Cordero testified that in June 1990, he stopped working with the group, hoping the threats would end if he stopped working with the group. Cordero testified that in October 1990, he was detained and robbed by members of a death squad and that these men told him to flee the country. Cordero also submitted documentary evidence about the situation in Guatemala. The IJ made an adverse credibility finding and denied Cordero’s application for asylum. Cordero appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed the IJ decision. The BIA found that inconsistencies in the application rendered Cordero’s testimony incredible. Cordero appealed to the First Circuit, arguing that the BIA erred in summarily adopting the IJ’s decision. Cordero argued that the BIA ignored substantial evidence in the record and accepted inappropriate assumptions about Guatemalan society in its conclusion about his well-founded fear of persecution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Aldrich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership