Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund
United States Supreme Court
473 U.S. 788 (1985)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The federal government (defendant) established a method for federal employees to make contributions to charities. An executive order created the Combined Federal Campaign, or CFC, which allowed for charities that provide or support direct health and welfare services to individuals or their families to submit short statements soliciting contributions. These short statements were compiled and used in the annual CFC fundraising drive. Federal employees could make one-time contributions or continuing payroll deductions. The executive order did not allow participation in the CFC by organizations that seek to influence the outcomes of elections or the determination of public policy through political activity or advocacy, lobbying, or litigation on behalf of parties other than themselves. However, the federal government permitted some organizations, like the World Wildlife Fund, that do not provide direct services to participate. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) (plaintiff) sought to be included in the CFC but was denied. An appeals court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted cert.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.