Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.

276 U.S. 358, 48 S. Ct. 380, 72 L. Ed. 610 (1928)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.

United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 358, 48 S. Ct. 380, 72 L. Ed. 610 (1928)

Facts

In 1916, George Kratz created an accelerator for the vulcanization of rubber. Kratz ran tests and kept notes on the invention at his place of employment. Kratz also discussed the invention with his work colleagues. In 1918, Kratz conducted tests on the invention that became the basis for a paper he presented at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in 1919. The paper was published in 1920. Morris Weiss conducted tests on the same type of rubber accelerator in 1919 (though the exact date was contested) and applied for a patent in 1921. The patent was issued in 1922 and assigned to Dovan Chemical Corporation (Dovan) (plaintiff). Dovan brought a patent-infringement suit against Corona Cord Tire Company (Corona) (defendant) in federal district court. Corona argued against the validity of Dovan’s patent. The court agreed, dismissing Dovan’s claim. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Weiss was the true first inventor. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taft, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership