Corporation Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
629 F.2d 786 (1980)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Venezolana de Cruceros del Caribe, C.A. (Cariven), a Venezuelan corporation, issued notes guaranteed by Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento, (CVF) (plaintiff), a Venezuelan government entity. The Merban Corporation (Merban), a Swiss corporation, bought the notes and resold a portion of them to several banks in the United States and Canada. Cariven subsequently defaulted on the notes and complex litigation ensued. Part of this litigation was a complaint filed by CVF in federal district court in New York, alleging that its guarantees of the notes were void. CVF pursued two theories in support of its allegation. First, it argued that it had never approved the notes. Second, it argued that that it had been fraudulently induced to guarantee the notes by Merban as well as by two New York corporations (defendants) owned by a New York resident named Vincent A. DeLyra (defendant). Merban counterclaimed to recover on CVF’s guarantees. The parties had previously agreed to apply New York law to issues arising from the guarantee of the notes. The district court applied New York law to all claims arising from the lawsuit, denied CVF’s claims, and found for Merban. CVF appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lumbard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.