Correia v. Commissioner

58 F.3d 468 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Correia v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
58 F.3d 468 (1995)

Facts

On April 9, 1991, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a deficiency notice to Vernon and Charlotte Correia (plaintiffs). The Correias had until July 8 for the United States Tax Court to receive their petition contesting the IRS’s determination. On July 8, the Correias sent their petition against the commissioner of the IRS (defendant) to the Tax Court via the Federal Express courier service. Federal Express delivered the Correias’ petition on July 9. The Tax Court dismissed the Correias’ petition as untimely. The Correias appealed, arguing that Internal Revenue Code (code) § 7502, which provided that the postmark on a document delivered by the United States Postal Service (Postal Service) was deemed to be the date of delivery, also should apply to documents delivered by Federal Express. The Correias further complained that the Tax Court should not have alerted the commissioner about the late filing of their petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership