Corry v. The Leland Stanford Junior University
California Superior Court
No. 740309 (1995)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford) (defendant) was a private school expressly founded to educate members of the public in the liberal arts. Stanford student Robert Corry (plaintiff) sued to enjoin enforcement of Stanford’s speech code, which Corry saw as a violation of his constitutional rights to free speech. The California Supreme Court rejected Stanford’s argument that the speech code was content-neutral and aimed only at deterring “fighting words” likely to incite violent conduct. The court agreed with Corry that the speech code was also content-based, aimed at deterring race-related or gender-related statements likely to offend some individuals but unlikely to spark violence. The court also agreed with Corry that a California education law known as the Leonard Law extended constitutional free-speech protection to students in private institutions like Stanford. The court then turned to Stanford’s argument that the Leonard Law should be struck down as an unconstitutional intrusion on Stanford’s own rights to free speech.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.