Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Cort v. Ash

United States Supreme Court
422 U.S. 66 (1975)


Facts

Ash (plaintiff) owned 50 shares of stock in Bethlehem Steel, of which Stewart Cort (defendant) was the chairman of the board of directors. In 1972, Cort used corporate funds to pay for advertisements in multiple national news magazines and local newspapers that included his name, picture, and direct quotes urging votes against U.S. presidential candidates who campaigned for higher taxes against businesses. The advertisements were also included in quarterly dividend checks mailed to Bethlehem shareholders and were available at the corporate office. Ash sued Cort in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, bringing a private claim for relief under a federal criminal statute that prohibited corporations from making contributions related to any U.S. presidential or vice-presidential election. 18 U.S.C. § 610. The complaint sought injunctive relief to stop future donations, as well as derivative monetary damages for the corporation. The district court granted summary judgment for Cort, and the court of appeals reversed, holding that a private action by a stockholder for derivative damages was proper under 18 U.S.C. § 610. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to Cort.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.