Cortland Savings and Banking Co. v. Platinum Rapid Funding Group, Ltd.
Ohio Court of Appeals
106 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 886 (2021)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Cortland Savings and Banking Company (Cortland Bank) (plaintiff) loaned 21st Century Concrete Construction, Inc. (21st Century) (debtor) $1 million. The loan was subject to a commercial security agreement, which gave Cortland Bank a security interest in several 21st Century assets, including a deposit account maintained by the bank. Later, Platinum Rapid Funding Group, Ltd. (Platinum) (defendant) advanced about $1.4 million to 21st Century. For repayment, Platinum was authorized to withdraw weekly amounts from 21st Century’s deposit account, and over the next year, $869,250 was transferred to Platinum in this manner. 21st Century later defaulted on its loan to Cortland Bank, and Cortland Bank obtained a $1 million judgment against 21st Century. Cortland Bank then brought an action against Platinum, seeking return of the funds transferred to Platinum from the deposit account. Cortland Bank’s allegations included conversion, impairment of a security interest, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with contract. Cortland Bank also alleged collusion between 21st Century and Platinum. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied Platinum’s motion and granted Cortland Bank’s motion with respect to conversion, impairment, and tortious interference. The court’s reasoning was that Cortland Bank had maintained a security interest in the deposit account’s funds. The court did not reach the issue of collusion. Platinum appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.