Cosey v. Cosey

364 So. 2d 186 (1978)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cosey v. Cosey

Louisiana Court of Appeals
364 So. 2d 186 (1978)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1915, Sidney and Hattie Cosey were married. The couple had one son, Sidney Cosey Jr. (Jr.) (plaintiff). In 1945, Sidney entered in a contract with the Cate Estate (defendants) under which the Cate Estate agreed to convey to Sidney an 11-acre parcel (the property) by warranty deed upon Sidney’s payment of specified installments totaling $825. In May 1961, Sidney completed the installment payments, but the Cate Estate could not deliver title to the property at that time because one of the owners had died. In May 1962, Sidney and Hattie divorced. The following month, Sidney married Lillian Cosey (defendant). In December 1962, the Cate Estate transferred the property to “Sidney and Lillian Cosey” through a recorded deed. In 1964 and 1976, respectively, Hattie and Sidney died. Jr., who was the administrator of his parents’ estates, sued Lillian and the Cate Estate for a declaration that the property belonged to the marital community of Sidney and Hattie. Jr. argued that the property was paid for with funds belonging to his parents’ marital community. The trial court rendered judgment for Jr., and Lillian appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ellis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership