Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.
Minnesota Supreme Court
313 N.W.2d 21 (1981)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Caromin House, Inc. (defendant) purchased land on which it planned to operate a group home for developmentally disabled adults. The home was to house six developmentally disabled adults and their house parents. All residents and house parents would share all areas of the home except for their individual bedrooms. Further, in accordance with the state statute under which Caromin would be granted a license to operate the home, all residents would share in household duties, including making meals and cleaning. The land was in a portion of town zoned for only one- and two-family dwellings. Costley and other neighbors (plaintiffs) brought suit seeking to enjoin Caromin’s use of the land for the group home on the ground that it did not constitute a one- or two-family dwelling. The trial court declined to grant the injunction. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.