Country Joe, Inc. v. City of Eagan

560 N.W.2d 681 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Country Joe, Inc. v. City of Eagan

Minnesota Supreme Court
560 N.W.2d 681 (1997)

SC

Facts

In order to compensate a shortfall of road funding in light of new development, in 1978 the City of Eagan (defendant) imposed a road-unit-connection charge as a prerequisite for the issuance of any building permit. Revenue from the charge was placed into a city account and not earmarked for any particular road project. Similarly, the city did not connect its actual road expenditures to any particular funds. When the charge was first adopted, the engineering plan recommended that the city review the charge annually and revise it every five years to account for changes in costs, revenues, and land-use patterns. In 1979, the city increased its estimated costs and thus increased the charge. The city, however, did not update its plan or amend the fee again until contractors (plaintiffs) sued the city in 1994. The contractors claimed that the charge was an unlawful tax. The court of appeals agreed and invalidated the charge. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Keith, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership