County of Allegheny v. Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union

381 A.2d 849, 476 Pa. 27 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

County of Allegheny v. Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
381 A.2d 849, 476 Pa. 27 (1977)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

The Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union (the union) (plaintiff) entered into a collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) with the county of Allegheny (the county) (defendant). The union filed a complaint with two grievances: (1) that the officers’ lounge where the guards took their meals be supervised at mealtime by a guard; and (2) that the officers be able to choose a lunchtime meal from anything the kitchen offered and not be limited to the menu for that particular day. The CBA did not address either issue, and it contained an integration clause, stating that the agreement, as written, was the full agreement of the parties. An arbitrator determined that the issue was arbitrable because it related to interpretation of the CBA, and the arbitrator issued an award that granted the union both of its demands. The arbitrator relied in part on the fact that the union’s demands constituted a past practice of the parties and concluded that the parties could not have included terms covering every past lunchtime practice. On appeal, the commonwealth court set aside the arbitrator’s award. The union appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pomeroy, J.)

Dissent (Roberts, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership