County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

222 Cal. App. 3d 647, 271 Cal. Rptr. 698 (1990)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal
222 Cal. App. 3d 647, 271 Cal. Rptr. 698 (1990)

JL

Facts

Alfredo Hernandez (plaintiff) sued the County of Los Angeles (County) (defendant), alleging medical malpractice. Initially, the County designated Dr. M. Anthony Verity, a board-certified pathologist, as an expert witness, and Dr. Verity prepared a report for the County. Hernandez had not yet designated a pathologist as an expert witness. Hernandez noticed the deposition of Dr. Verity. However, a few days before the scheduled deposition date, the County withdrew its designation of Dr. Verity as an expert. The County’s counsel informed Dr. Verity that his testimony may not be needed at trial, but the County wanted to continue using him as a consultant to prepare for trial. Hernandez’s counsel contacted Dr. Verity and insisted that Hernandez could hire Dr. Verity now. Dr. Verity expressed doubts, but Hernandez’s counsel was persistent. Dr. Verity met with Hernandez’s counsel and discussed the report that Dr. Verity had prepared for the County. Hernandez then designated Dr. Verity as his expert witness. The County discovered what had happened and moved for a protective order. The County also requested that Hernandez’s counsel be disqualified because he had viewed the County’s privileged attorney work product and could not unview it. The trial court denied the County’s motion and allowed Hernandez to designate Dr. Verity as an expert. The County appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goertzen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership