County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

United States Supreme Court
140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Play video

Facts

The Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits the discharge of pollutants from a point source into navigable waters without a permit issued by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In passing the CWA, Congress declined the EPA’s request that the CWA also authorize the EPA to regulate ground water because pollution may be discharged into navigable waters through ground water. Instead, Congress included within the CWA certain pollution control requirements to protect ground waters that states must follow. In 2012, the Hawai'i Wildlife Fund and several other environmental protection groups (environmental groups) filed an action in federal district court against the County of Maui (the county) (defendant) for violating the CWA. The environmental groups claimed that the county’s wastewater facility was discharging pollutants into ground water which was then carried to the Pacific Ocean. The district court granted summary judgment in the environmental groups’ favor on the ground that, because the path of pollutants from the facility to the Pacific Ocean through the ground water was ascertainable, it was the equivalent of the facility directly adding pollutants to a navigable water. The matter was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The circuit court affirmed the summary judgment on the ground that the pollutants were fairly traceable from the facility to the Pacific Ocean and, therefore, required a permit under the CWA. The matter was appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership