Cowen v. Pressprich

194 N.Y.S. 926 (1922)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cowen v. Pressprich

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
194 N.Y.S. 926 (1922)

  • Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Play video

Facts

The facts of this case are provided in Cowen v. Pressprich, 192 N.Y.S. 242 (1922). Stock-exchange brokers (sellers) (plaintiffs) agreed to sell and deliver an Oregon Short Line Railroad bond to another group of brokers (buyers) (defendants). A third party provided the sellers with an Oregon & California Railroad bond by mistake. The sellers did not realize the mistake and used a messenger to deliver the bond to the buyers’ office. The office’s delivery room contained a slot and a closed window. The buyers’ employees were located in a room adjacent to the slot and window. After placing the bond in the slot, the sellers’ messenger quickly left the building. One of the buyers’ employees realized that the bond had been delivered by mistake. The employee opened the window and handed the bond to an unidentified messenger, mistakenly believing him to be the sellers’ messenger. The unidentified messenger took the bond, but never returned it to the sellers. The sellers sued the buyers for conversion, claiming that the buyers had an absolute duty to redeliver the bond. A lower court ruled for the sellers. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Term affirmed the judgment, with $25 in costs. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division reversed the lower court, based on the dissenting opinion of Justice Lehman in Cowen.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lehman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Property

Key Terms