Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Cox Communications, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, In re

Delaware Court of Chancery
879 A.2d 604 (2005)


The Cox family, holders of 74 percent of the stock of Cox Communications, Inc. (Cox) (defendant), decided to take the company private in 2004. On August 2, 2004, Cox announced a proposal to purchase the remaining shares at $32 per share. The board set up a special committee to consider the proposal and negotiate on behalf of minority shareholders. At the same time, numerous lawsuits were filed on behalf of minority shareholders (plaintiffs), alleging that the price was unfair and that the Cox family was trying to extract all the profit from the enterprise for itself. The special committee retained counsel, and after a lengthy period of negotiation ultimately accepted a bid from Cox for $34.75 per share, on the condition that a majority of the minority shareholders approve the deal. While the special committee’s work was ongoing, the Cox family was also negotiating with the plaintiff-shareholders’ attorneys. At various times the plaintiffs’ attorneys demanded a price of $37 per share and a condition that a majority of the minority shareholders approve the transaction. After the special committee obtained its deal, the attorney for the Cox family told the plaintiffs’ attorneys that $34.75 per share with a majority of the minority approval condition was the final offer. The attorneys accepted the deal and agreed to settle the litigation. The Cox family signed the merger agreement on in October 2004. In the final stipulation of settlement of the litigation, the Cox family agreed not to oppose attorney’s fees for the plaintiffs’ attorneys of $5 million. No one filed objections to the merger settlement, but several parties filed objections to the attorney’s fees. They argued that since the special committee handled the negotiation, the lawsuits served virtually no purpose other than to generate attorney’s fees.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial