Cox v. City of Dallas, Texas

256 F.3d 281 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cox v. City of Dallas, Texas

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
256 F.3d 281 (2001)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

For over 25 years, there had been two sites in residential areas of Dallas used for illegal dumping of solid waste, the Deepwood and South Loop 12 dumps. The City of Dallas (defendant) received many complaints from residents concerning the illegal dumping. At one point, the city sued the owners of Deepwood for operating an illegal dump site, but the site continued operating. The city also contracted with a company, Dallas Demolition, for demolition work without specifying how the city’s waste materials should be disposed, and Dallas Demolition dumped at the Deepwood dump. This dumping continued even after the city’s attorneys became aware. More recently, the State of Texas inspected the Deepwood dump site and noted massive illegal dumping, including dumping of asbestos, benzene, and medical waste. There was an imminent threat of discharge of solid waste into a bordering creek, and toxic waste posed a risk of contaminating surface and ground water. The Deepwood dump had twice caught fire, and it required significant clean-up efforts. As to South Loop 12, the city had in the past used it as a landfill but had failed to appropriately bury the waste. No corrective action to clean the dump had ever been taken, and South Loop 12 remained an open dump. Both South Loop 12 and Deepwood were easily accessible to children and presented significant fire and health hazards. Residents adjoining the dumps (plaintiffs) sued the City of Dallas under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act seeking injunctive relief to stop illegal open dumping on the sites and to remove the solid waste. The district court granted the injunction, and the city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (King, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership