Cox v. Glenbrook Co.

371 P.2d 647 (1962)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cox v. Glenbrook Co.

Nevada Supreme Court
371 P.2d 647 (1962)

SC
Play video

Facts

The Glenbrook Company (Glenbrook) (plaintiff) operates a resort and golf course in Nevada. Henry Quill owned property next to the golf course, but there was no access to the Quill property other than through the Glenbrook property on one of two roads. The road primarily used (back road) had only enough room for one car to pass through at a time. Glenbrook granted an easement in writing (Quill Easement) “over the roads of [Glenbrook] as now located” to Quill, “his heirs and assigns forever.” When Quill died, Kenneth Johnson bought his property and Johnson eventually sold the property to Cox and Detrick (Cox) (defendants). Cox proposed to divide the property into smaller parcels in order to develop the property into a residential area. Cox also proposed widening the back road and possibly allowing future residents of his development to use it. Glenbrook and Cox each sought a declaratory judgment on the scope and extent of the Quill Easement. The lower court determined that the easement is restricted to use of the back road as presently constructed by a single family.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership