Coy v. Iowa

487 U.S. 1012, 108 S. Ct. 2798 (1988)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Coy v. Iowa

United States Supreme Court
487 U.S. 1012, 108 S. Ct. 2798 (1988)

DC

Facts

In 1985, a man entered the backyard tent two 13-year-old girls were camping in and sexually assaulted them. During the assault, the assailant was wearing a stocking on his head, and the girls could not later describe his face. The next-door neighbor, Mr. Coy (defendant), was subsequently arrested for the crime and charged with two counts of lascivious acts with a child. At trial, the prosecution moved to allow the victims to testify by either closed-circuit television or behind a screen, pursuant to a new state law that allowed these procedures, so that the victims would feel less uneasy during testimony. The trial court approved the use of a screen during the victims’ testimony. The screen enabled Coy to perceive the victims but blocked the victims from seeing Coy at all. The court overruled Coy’s objection to the use of the screen at trial but instructed the jury that they were not to draw an inference of guilt from the use of the screen. Coy was ultimately convicted of the crimes, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership