Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Coyne-Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
717 F.2d 385 (1983)


Facts

The Capital Development Board (the Board) (defendant) bid out a contract to replace plumbing fixtures in a state prison. Coyne-Delany Co. (CD) was awarded a subcontract for toilet-flush valves in the first phase of the project. The valves malfunctioned, were replaced, and again malfunctioned. For the second phase of the project, the Board required all bidders to use CD’s competitor. After bids were received in May 1979 CD sued the Board under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and obtained a temporary restraining order prohibiting the Board from opening the bids. The Board requested that CD be required to post a $50,000 bond due to the potential expense of delaying the project. The trial court only required a $5,000 bond and issued a preliminary injunction without increasing the bond. The trial court determined that CD was likely to prevail on the merits based on having a property right in the ability to bid which was taken away without due process. Subsequently, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision holding that a bidder has no property right in being able to bid on a public contract. The preliminary injunction was reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 22, 1980. The Board discovered that the low bid on the project was $214,000, but the bid was conditioned on a deadline that had passed. The Board rebid the project, and the lowest bid received was $270,000. The Board then sought $56,000 in damages against CD and its surety for the wrongfully issued injunction. The trial court declined to award any damages, and the Board again appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.