Crabtree v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

948 F.3d 872 (2020)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Crabtree v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
948 F.3d 872 (2020)

Facts

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) prohibited consumer-reporting agencies (CRAs) from disclosing consumer-credit information except in enumerated circumstances. One circumstance was the provision of a list of consumers meeting specified criteria to a prospective lender. The disclosure of such prescreen lists was permissible only if the recipient lender offered credit or insurance to each of the consumers on the list. The provision reflected Congress’s conclusion that any negative impact of the limited disclosure was outweighed by the guaranteed offer of credit or insurance. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Experian) (defendant) was a CRA that compiled consumer information into credit reports and scores. Experian had a contract with Western Sierra (Western) that allowed Western to receive prescreen lists based on Experian data. The lists were compiled and provided via third parties, which was permissible under the FCRA. Experian terminated its contract with Western, effective November 18, 2011. However, a prescreen list containing Experian data reached Western on November 30, when it no longer had authority to receive the data. Neither company was aware of the mistake. Nearly five years later, a lawyer discovered the prescreen list. That lawyer came to represent Quentin Crabtree (plaintiff), one of the list’s named consumers, in a suit against Experian for violation of the FCRA. Crabtree admitted that he likely received an offer of credit from Western in 2011. He also admitted that he would not have acted on such an offer. Nevertheless, Crabtree argued that he had a viable claim because Experian technically engaged in an unauthorized release of his information in violation of the FCRA. The district court dismissed Crabtree’s claim, concluding that he lacked standing because any injury from Experian’s conduct was too remote and speculative. Crabtree appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scudder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership