Crawford v. Metropolitan Government
United States Supreme Court
129 S. Ct. 846 (2009)
In 2002, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (Metro) (defendant) began investigating whether an employee-relations director, Gene Hughes, was guilty of sexual harassment. As part of Metro’s investigation, a Metro human-resources officer questioned Vicky Crawford (plaintiff) about whether Crawford had witnessed inappropriate behavior by Hughes. Crawford disclosed in detail several occasions in which Hughes had sexually harassed Crawford. Metro later fired Crawford for alleged embezzlement. Crawford sued Metro, alleging that Metro had fired Crawford in retaliation for reporting Hughes in a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Metro. The court of appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.