From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Crawford v. Pacific Western Mobile Estates
Missouri Court of Appeals
548 S.W.2d 216 (1977)
Pacific Western Mobile Estates, Inc. (Pacific) (defendant) acquired a trailer park with spaces for 143 trailers. The trailer park included a sewage treatment plant 200 yards away from the nearest trailer. The treatment plant had a settlement tank with dimensions resembling a swimming pool. The water in the tank was maintained at 1.5 feet below the rim, and there was no ladder. A bridge-like wooden contraption spanned the tank, as did a metal lattice. A six-foot-tall fence with locked gates surrounded the tank. No signs warned against entering the treatment plant. When Pacific acquired the trailer park, the previous owner removed 60 trailers. Each trailer had been supported with concrete blocks, which were left behind. Pacific’s employees stacked the abandoned concrete blocks against the wooden fence enclosing the tank, forming a staircase to the top of the fence. Pacific’s manager was aware that the children living in the trailer park played all over the premises. Mark Crawford lived in the trailer park with his family. He was six years old and knew how to swim. One day Mark and several other children were playing on the concrete blocks. The group of children called to an older child who was passing by and told him that a child was in the settlement tank. Only a children’s ball was visible floating on the surface. Mark’s father and a neighbor dragged the tank with a rake and pulled out Mark’s body. Mark’s parents (plaintiffs) sued Pacific and its manager for the wrongful death of their son. A jury found in favor of the Crawfords and awarded them $30,000 in damages. The trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Pacific. The Crawfords appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wasserstrom, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.