Crawley v. Hathaway

721 N.E.2d 1208 (1999)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Crawley v. Hathaway

Illinois Appellate Court
721 N.E.2d 1208 (1999)

Facts

Mark Hathaway (defendant) agreed to sell land to Douglas Crawley (plaintiff). Hathaway and Crawley signed a hand-written contract that specified the sale would include about 100 acres made up of pasture, timber, and tillable ground. After agreeing to the sale, Hathaway commissioned a survey and directed the surveyor to plot out the piece of land that Hathaway and Crawley had agreed would make up the sale. After the survey revealed that the land in question actually amounted to 127 acres, Hathaway decided he did not want to complete the contract with Crawley and instead listed the land for a higher price with a real estate broker. Crawley sued Hathaway for specific performance to force the sale. Hathaway filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that the jurisdiction’s statute of frauds prevented the enforcement of the contract because the contract failed to include a sufficient description of the land. The lower court granted summary judgment to Hathaway. Crawley appealed, alleging that the statute of frauds did not bar the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCullough, J.)

Dissent (Steigmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership