Creasy v. Rusk

730 N.E.2d 659 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Creasy v. Rusk

Indiana Supreme Court
730 N.E.2d 659 (2000)

Play video

Facts

Lloyd Rusk (defendant) suffered from advanced-stage Alzheimer's disease, which caused him to suffer intense confusion, memory loss, anxiety, depression, and agitation. When Rusk's wife became unable to care for him, she admitted him to a nursing home at which Carol Creasy (plaintiff) worked as a nursing assistant. Creasy's responsibilities included caring for Rusk and other Alzheimer's patients. Rusk's disease often made him belligerent, combative, and aggressive toward nursing-home staff as they attempted to care for him. One evening, Creasy knew that Rusk had been particularly violent and aggressive. As Creasy and another nursing assistant attempted to put Rusk to bed, Rusk kicked Creasy several times in the knee and hip. Creasy was injured, and she brought a negligence claim against Rusk seeking damages for her injuries. The trial court granted summary judgment in Rusk's favor, but the appellate court reversed. The Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer and reviewed the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership