Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. v. Carlbom
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
50 P.3d 431 (2002)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Cosco Carlbom (defendant) was the owner and sole proprietor of Aloha Screens, which was a sole proprietorship that had gone out of business. In or around 1993, Aloha Screens had entered into an oral contract for telephone and other services from the GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, which later came to be known as Verizon Hawaii (Verizon). Aloha Screens had paid some of its monthly telephone bills to Verizon but owed Verizon $3,077.79 in unpaid bills by May 1998. Verizon assigned its right to collect the unpaid amount to Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. (Credit Associates) (plaintiff). Credit Associates then sued Carlbom, individually and doing business as Aloha Screens, seeking to recover the money. At trial, Carlbom admitted that he was Aloha Screens’ owner and sole proprietor. Carlbom also admitted that the telephone numbers for which Aloha Screens owed Verizon the money were Aloha Screens’ phone numbers. A Verizon representative admitted that the representative did not know of any papers that Carlbom had signed agreeing to be responsible for the phone services provided by Verizon to Aloha Screens. The trial court awarded Credit Associates $3,077.79 from Aloha Screens but found that Carlbom could not be held individually liable for the debt because the agreement for the service had been made between Aloha Screens and Verizon, and Verizon did not have an agreement with Carlbom acknowledging Carlbom’s personal liability for the debt. Credit Associates appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Watanabe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.