Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. v. Carlbom

50 P.3d 431 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. v. Carlbom

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
50 P.3d 431 (2002)

Facts

Cosco Carlbom (defendant) was the owner and sole proprietor of Aloha Screens, which was a sole proprietorship that had gone out of business. In or around 1993, Aloha Screens had entered into an oral contract for telephone and other services from the GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, which later came to be known as Verizon Hawaii (Verizon). Aloha Screens had paid some of its monthly telephone bills to Verizon but owed Verizon $3,077.79 in unpaid bills by May 1998. Verizon assigned its right to collect the unpaid amount to Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. (Credit Associates) (plaintiff). Credit Associates then sued Carlbom, individually and doing business as Aloha Screens, seeking to recover the money. At trial, Carlbom admitted that he was Aloha Screens’ owner and sole proprietor. Carlbom also admitted that the telephone numbers for which Aloha Screens owed Verizon the money were Aloha Screens’ phone numbers. A Verizon representative admitted that the representative did not know of any papers that Carlbom had signed agreeing to be responsible for the phone services provided by Verizon to Aloha Screens. The trial court awarded Credit Associates $3,077.79 from Aloha Screens but found that Carlbom could not be held individually liable for the debt because the agreement for the service had been made between Aloha Screens and Verizon, and Verizon did not have an agreement with Carlbom acknowledging Carlbom’s personal liability for the debt. Credit Associates appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Watanabe, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership