Creel v. Crim
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
812 So. 2d 1259 (2001)
Tisia Baker Lovelady (defendant) hired Glenn Creel (defendant) to harvest timber on Lovelady’s property. Forest R. Crim (plaintiff) sued both Creel and Lovelady for trespass, claiming that Creel had removed trees from Crim’s property. Creel filed a cross-claim against Lovelady for indemnification against Crim’s claim, contending that Lovelady had represented that she owned the property where Crim’s trees were located. At trial, Crim presented evidence that trees had been taken from his property, which had been distinguished from Lovelady’s property by a visible fence line. Additionally, the evidence showed that Creel had written a note to Crim apologizing for overcutting. The trial court found Creel, but not Lovelady, liable for trespass and ordered Creel to pay damages of $5,400. The trial court then ordered Lovelady to pay $2,700 to partially indemnify Creel. Creel appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Murdock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.