Creel v. Lilly
Maryland Court of Appeals
729 A.2d 385 (1999)
- Written by John Caddell, JD
Facts
In 1993, Joseph Creel (plaintiff), Arnold Lily (defendant), and Roy Altizer (defendant) formed a partnership to operate a NASCAR memorabilia business called Joe’s Racing Collectibles. Joseph Creel died in 1995. The partnership agreement did not provide for the continuation of the partnership after a partner’s death, and Joseph’s widow and representative of his estate, Anne Creel (plaintiff), insisted that the partnership be terminated. Lilly and Altizer conducted an inventory of the business and hired an accountant to compute the business’ value. Anne Creel made no attempt to calculate her own estimate. Lilly and Altizer then continued to operate the business under a new name: Good Ole Boys Racing (defendant). Anne Creel sued Lilly, Altizer, and Good Ole Boys Racing, requesting an accounting and a declaratory judgment that Lilly and Altizer were not permitted to continue the partnership over her objections. The trial court found that Lilly and Altizer were not required to liquidate the business assets but only to pay Creel’s estate the appropriate percentage share of the business’ value. The intermediate appellate court affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chasanow, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.