Crowder Construction Co. v. Kiser

1998 WL 34032496 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Crowder Construction Co. v. Kiser

North Carolina Superior Court
1998 WL 34032496 (1998)

CS

Facts

Eugene Kiser (plaintiff) was an employee of Crowder Construction Company (Crowder) (defendant). Crowder adopted stock-option plans that enabled Kiser to purchase, for $7 per share, 2,000 shares of Crowder stock in 1986 and 4,750 shares in 1988. Under the buy-sell provisions of Crowder’s shareholders’ agreement, Kiser was required to sell his shares back to Crowder upon termination of his employment. If Kiser held his shares for at least seven years, the repurchase price would be equal to the stock’s book value per share, subject to certain adjustments (adjusted book value). If Kiser held his shares for less than seven years, the repurchase price would be $7 per share, plus or minus the change in adjusted book value since his purchase of the shares. Around 1994, Kiser’s working relationship with Crowder’s president and other senior officers deteriorated, with Kiser openly disagreeing with many of their business decisions as Crowder struggled with economic challenges. This led to Kiser’s firing in January 1995, which was more than seven years after his purchase of 2,000 shares in 1986 but less than seven years after his purchase of 4,750 shares in 1988. As a result, the repurchase price for the 2,000 shares was much higher than the repurchase price for the 4,750 shares. The former was $56.42 per share—Crowder’s adjusted book value per share as of March 31, 1994—while the latter was $18.59 per share—$7 plus the increase in Crowder’s adjusted book value per share since 1988. Had Kiser remain employed by Crowder until later in 1995, he would have met the seven-year holding-period requirement on the 4,750 shares and been entitled to an additional $180,000. After Kiser refused to sell his shares back to Crowder, Crowder sued for specific enforcement of the shareholders’ agreement. Kiser argued that enforcement would be unconscionable, mainly because (1) Crowder allegedly timed his firing to occur before March 31, 1995, when Crowder had a higher book value than it did as of March 31, 1994, and before his seven-year holding period on the 4,750 shares ended, both of which were intended to enable Crowder to repurchase those shares at a much lower price; and (2) his employment was allegedly terminated without warning.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership