Crowther v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Utah
2019 WL 1059966 (2019)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Travis Crowther (plaintiff) underwent hip-replacement surgery. Doctors implanted a prosthetic hip joint made by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (defendant). Crowther developed metallosis, a condition caused when metal implant components rub against each other and abrade. Metal ions flake off, causing inflammation in surrounding tissue and other problems. Crowther underwent a second surgery to remove the Wright System implant, which revealed that a black residue had developed between the ball and socket. Crowther brought a products-liability action against Wright, including a claim that Wright defectively manufactured the implant. Specifically, Crowther alleged that the size of the ball and socket in his implant differed from manufacturing specifications and other implants in the same product line that were supposed to be identical. Crowther claimed the size difference made the clearance vary in his implant, causing pain and metallosis. Wright moved to dismiss the manufacturing-defect claim, arguing Crowther had not pled enough specific facts to support it.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nuffer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.