From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
479 F.3d 1099 (2007)
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. (CRST) (plaintiff) had a program to help people become certified truck drivers. CRST would enter into a driver-training agreement with an individual and pay for driver training at a school selected by the individual followed by a CRST orientation program. If CRST and a student decided to enter into an employment contract, CRST would pay for driver training with a CRST lead driver. Under the employment contract, the term of employment was for one year subject to termination by CRST for due cause prior to the end of the term. After one year, the employment would be at will and could be terminated by CRST or the employee at any time. During the one-year contract term, CRST could only terminate the employee for due cause, by mutual agreement, or upon the employee’s death. If the employee breached the one-year contract term or was terminated for due cause, the employee would have to reimburse CRST $3,600. If the employee was terminated without due cause, the employee would not have to repay the $3,600. Two drivers (the drivers) signed training agreements and employment contracts with CRST. A month later, Werner Enterprises, Inc. (Werner) (defendant) requested information about the drivers, putting CRST on notice that the drivers had applied for jobs with Werner. CRST responded with three letters to Werner, advising Werner of the drivers’ contracts with CRST. The drivers accepted positions with Werner. CRST sued Werner for intentional interference with contract, negligent interference with contract, and interference with prospective economic advantage. The district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. CRST appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.