Cruz v. Leviev Fulton Club, LLC
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
711 F. Supp. 2d 329 (2010)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act required interstate sellers of undeveloped lots to file a statement of record with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, provide purchasers with a printed property report before the signing of any contract, and make certain disclosures about the lots within the contract. However, the seller was exempt from the act if the land sales contract obligated the seller to erect a building on the land within two years. Eddie Cruz (plaintiff) contracted to purchase a condominium from Leviev Fulton Club, LLC (defendant) and made a down payment. When the time for closing came, Cruz failed to appear or tender performance and Leviev kept the down payment. Cruz sued, arguing that Leviev failed to provide him with the reports required by the act and he was thus entitled to revoke the agreement and get his down payment back. Leviev argued that it was exempt from the act because it had agreed to build on the lot within two years. Specifically, Leviev pointed to language in the sales contract that stated Leviev would give buyers a chance to rescind the agreement if building did not begin within two years and that Leviev anticipated building on the land within two years if there were no unavoidable delays.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gorenstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.