United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 186 (1987)
Eulogio Cruz (defendant) was indicted along with his brother Benjamin for felony murder of a gas station attendant. Benjamin confessed to the murder while he was being questioned in connection to another murder. He made a videotaped statement implicating Eulogio in the gas station attendant’s murder. Eulogio and Benjamin were tried jointly. Over Eulogio’s objections, the court allowed the prosecution to introduce the videotape into evidence. The jury was instructed that Benjamin’s confession was not to be used against Eulogio. At the end of trial, the only evidence admissible against Eulogio was the testimony of a friend of his, Norberto. Norberto testified that the day after the gas station incident, Eulogio appeared nervous and he had a bloody bandage around his arm. Norberto told the court that Eulogio confided in him and had told Norberto that he and Benjamin had gone to the gas station to rob it, that the attendant shot him, and that Benjamin then shot and killed the attendant. The jury convicted Eulogio and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.