Crystal Entertainment & Filmworks, Inc. v. Jurado
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
643 F.3d 1313 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In 1984, the predecessor in interest to Crystal Entertainment & Filmworks, Inc. (plaintiff) formed “Exposé,” a girl dance band. The band made one song that was played on the radio but generally did not achieve commercial success. The likenesses of the original band members were not used on the album cover or in any connection with the name Exposé. In 1986, Jeanette Jurado, Ann Curless, and Gioia Bruno (current members) (defendants) replaced the original members of Exposé. The current members made albums and performed as Exposé since that time. The current members’ first album as Exposé went triple platinum. The current members’ pictures were used on this and subsequent albums, and in connection with the name “Exposé.” In 2006, the current members signed a licensing agreement with Crystal and began paying licensing fees. Crystal exerted limited control over the band, and at some point, the current members stopped paying the licensing fees and informed Crystal that it planned to register the trademark Exposé on their own. Crystal brought suit for trademark infringement. At trial, Crystal acknowledged that the current members had been the “face of Exposé since 1986.” The district court found that the current members were the common-law owners of the trademark Exposé. Crystal appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pryor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.