CTIA—The Wireless Association v. Echols
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
2013 WL 6633177 (2013)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The federal Lifeline program offers subsidies to eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) for providing discounted or free phone services to low-income households. Governing federal regulations limit eligibility to one subsidized phone line per household. The Georgia Public Service Commission (GPSC) (defendant) determined that some households fraudulently used more than one free or discounted subsidized line by signing up for the Lifeline program with multiple ETCs. To discourage this practice, the GPSC adopted an amended rule requiring each ETC to either (1) bill Lifeline customers a minimum rate of $5 per month or (2) provide a minimum of 500 minutes of use per month. CTIA—The Wireless Association (CTIA) (plaintiff) sued GPSC Commissioner Tim Echols (defendant), seeking a preliminary injunction preventing the GPSC from effectuating the rule, arguing that the rule is a rate regulation prohibited by the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (the act). The GPSC contended that the rules’ requirements did not regulate rates in violation of the act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Story, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.