Culpepper-Smith v. United States
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
50 F. Supp. 2d 425 (1999)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
In 1991, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed taxes against Lena Culpepper-Smith (plaintiff) for 1980. The IRS subsequently applied Culpepper-Smith’s 1993 and 1995 refunds to her 1980 taxes. Culpepper-Smith sued the United States (defendant), seeking (1) an injunction barring the IRS from collecting the 1980 taxes; (2) payment of her 1993 and 1995 refunds; and (3) damages, attorney’s fees, and other costs. In June 1998, the United States conceded that the IRS did not send Culpepper-Smith the required deficiency notice, represented that it would abate the 1980 assessment, and asked Culpepper-Smith to stipulate to dismissal. Culpepper-Smith declined to stipulate to dismissal, presumably because the IRS could have issued a new 1980 assessment and because she would have had to forgo fees and costs. In July, the United States moved to dismiss, and Culpepper-Smith cross-moved (1) for summary judgment regarding a permanent injunction, attorney’s fees and other costs, and damages; (2) to amend her complaint to specifically request payment of the refunds; and (3) to enforce the IRS’s concession and to prohibit the IRS from collecting on the 1980 assessment. In August, the court dismissed Culpepper-Smith’s injunction claim and denied Culpepper-Smith’s motion to enforce the IRS’s concession, both subject to the IRS’s abatement of the 1980 assessment and removal of all liens and levies against Culpepper-Smith. The district court also denied Culpepper-Smith’s other motions. In March 1999, the parties stipulated to the dismissal of Culpepper-Smith’s remaining damages claim. Contending that she was the prevailing party, Culpepper-Smith then moved for attorney’s fees and other costs pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (code) § 7430. The United States effectively conceded that Culpepper-Smith was the prevailing party regarding the 1980 assessment, but the United States contended that Culpepper-Smith did not prevail on the other issues that were litigated after the United States’ June 1998 concession.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Neill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

