Cumming v. Board of Education
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 528 (1899)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Georgia Constitution required public-school segregation. State law also required that school boards provide public elementary schools for White and Black students. However, state law gave school boards discretion whether to create public high schools. The Richmond County Board of Education (board) (defendant) operated a few White high schools and one Black high school for several years. As the number of Black elementary students grew, Richmond County had trouble accommodating them in its existing schools. The board claimed that it did have enough money to build additional schools or hire more teachers. The board closed the 60-student Black high school and converted it to a Black elementary school for 300 students. That same year, the board imposed a tax to fund all the county’s public elementary schools and high schools. Joseph Cumming and two other tax-paying Black men with high-school-aged children (the taxpayers) (plaintiffs) sued the board in state court. The taxpayers alleged that the board had violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by requiring Black citizens to pay taxes that funded White high schools but not Black high schools. The taxpayers asked the court to enjoin the board from operating the White high schools until the board provided equal high-school facilities for Black students. The trial court issued the injunction. The Georgia Supreme Court reversed, ruling that the taxpayers’ claims should be dismissed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.