Cummins Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
29 Ct. Int’l Trade 525 (2005)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) provided preferential duty treatment to goods that originated from a NAFTA country. Cummins Inc. (plaintiff) sought to import crankshafts that it transformed into crankshafts in Mexico out of semifinished products originating from a non-NAFTA country. Customs consulted with the World Customs Organization (WCO), which determined that the work done by Cummins on the crankshafts prior to importation into the United States was not enough to change the product’s tariff classification under the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System. Accordingly, the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (customs) (defendant) determined that a 2.5 percent duty applied to the crankshafts because Cummins had not sufficiently transformed the imported products so as to render the crankshafts as originating from Mexico. Cummins challenged customs’ determination, and customs filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pogue, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.