Cunningham v. Brown
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 1 (1924)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Bankruptcy trustees brought six suits against Charles Ponzi based on Ponzi’s scheme to defraud investors by paying older investors’ alleged returns with money given to Ponzi by newer investors. In fact, Ponzi never invested the money in anything. When a newspaper reported the details of the scheme, there was an investor run on Ponzi’s accounts. Some investors claimed that they had rescinded their agreements with Ponzi and that this gave them priority over others who were trying to get their money back by the terms of Ponzi’s contract. The investors who allegedly rescinded sued for priority, and the district court and the appeals court ruled in their favor. The United States Supreme Court granted cert.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taft, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.